Tort-tort scientists are using lawsuits rather than evidence to ban products.
Scientists working for law firms got IARC to hold panels to help them sue industry.
This rising sense of purpose is an opportunity for gurus and marketers.
Tort-torts leaving the lab for the lawsuit are damaging science.
The Lancet’s assault on Big Food aims to deny the best researchers from the scientific debate.
Has scientific consensus become a religious dogma?
A group of activists show why they are not qualified.
I show why they are wrong.
Should scientists design research for toxic tort law firms? How does this slime affect trust in science?
Germans want to tax technology to fund activists who want to stop technology … Hmm.
Virtue signallers tell me I’m good if I bash plastics. I disagree.
For years, the European Commission failed to act on NPBTs. Now they have failed Europe.
Activists believe we can only empower people by disempowering others. I don’t.