The 30 Cancers of Corruption Killing IARC
IARC uses a network of activist scientists and journalists to relentlessly attack their “enemies”.
The thousands of cases against glyphosate is part of a gameplan that used IARC.
IARC cherry-picks their scientists, ignores and hides conflicts of interest and then lies about them.
Emails reveal IARC produced a third monograph on benzene solely because US tort law firms needed it to sue industry.
Who can challenge the Predatorts as they corrupt scientists and destroy public trust in technology?
Tort-tort scientists are using lawsuits rather than evidence to ban products.
Scientists working for law firms got IARC to hold panels to help them sue industry.
Why do NGOs celebrate a band of thieves who leave so many victims in their wake?
Should scientists design research for toxic tort law firms? How does this slime affect trust in science?
Activists are pushing their version of citizen science on regulators as an alternative to proper academic research.
IARC’s recent letter to the US Congress showed six different ways to lie.