Christopher Portier – The Risk-Monger

Why I don’t Publish in Peer-Reviewed Journals

When activists like USRTK’s Gary Ruskin pay for academic cred, you know the peer-review process is broken.

IARC uses a network of activist scientists and journalists to relentlessly attack their “enemies”.

The thousands of cases against glyphosate is part of a gameplan that used IARC.

IARC cherry-picks their scientists, ignores and hides conflicts of interest and then lies about them.

Tort-tort scientists are using lawsuits rather than evidence to ban products.

Scientists working for law firms got IARC to hold panels to help them sue industry.

How Predatorts fund their corrupt activities: no scrutiny, no transparency.

Pt 3 of the Insignificant Trilogy. Green activists are controlling policy debates by denying other voices in stakeholder dialogue.

IARC’s recent letter to the US Congress showed six different ways to lie.

The 2017 Risk-Monger “Lump of Coal” Awards

Activists who demand that others be transparent are often not open themselves. They are transparocrites.

Portier was paid $160K to attack glyphosate by lawyers suing Monsanto.