Christopher Portier – The Risk-Monger

SlimeGate 3.2.3.4: Retract the Smith et al. (2016) paper: “Key Characteristics of Carcinogens…”

If papers are retracted because of industry interest, why aren’t papers written for the litigation industry retracted?

Part 3 of the SlimeGate talc exposé shows how IARC was working in service to the US litigation industry.

Join the Ramazzini sect and enjoy untold political privileges.

This anti-glyphosate campaign film is an ode to our heroic Predatorts.

Three years after the questions, I finally got some answers. It was never about glyphosate.

When activists like USRTK’s Gary Ruskin pay for academic cred, you know the peer-review process is broken.

IARC uses a network of activist scientists and journalists to relentlessly attack their “enemies”.

The thousands of cases against glyphosate is part of a gameplan that used IARC.

IARC cherry-picks their scientists, ignores and hides conflicts of interest and then lies about them.

Tort-tort scientists are using lawsuits rather than evidence to ban products.

Scientists working for law firms got IARC to hold panels to help them sue industry.

How Predatorts fund their corrupt activities: no scrutiny, no transparency.